Blog
Best Fertility Clinics in USA: How They Compare to Rejuvenating Fertility Center (RFC)
For women trying to conceive—especially those over 35 or 40—choosing the right fertility clinic is one of the most important decisions you can make. In this blog, we’ll compare several top fertility clinics in New York with Rejuvenating Fertility Center (RFC), a rising leader in patient-centered, holistic fertility care.
1. RMA of New York (Reproductive Medicine Associates)
Affiliation: Mount Sinai
Focus: High-tech IVF, PGT-A, donor egg, surrogacy
✅ Pros:
- Strong success rates, especially with PGT-A
- Large team and network of doctors
- Full suite of services including donor and LGBTQ+ options
- Cutting-edge lab technology and embryo banking
❌ Cons:
- Large, busy practice—may feel impersonal
- Less focus on natural/mild stimulation IVF
- Limited availability of experimental therapies (no PRP, ozone)
Compared to RFC: RMA is ideal for patients seeking conventional IVF with genetic testing and large infrastructure. RFC is better for those wanting a personalized and holistic approach.
2. NYU Langone Fertility Center
Affiliation: NYU Langone Health
Focus: Evidence-based IVF, egg freezing, academic research
✅ Pros:
- Excellent success rates for women 38–40 (~56.5%)
- Academic rigor and top-tier embryology lab
- Leaders in egg freezing and long-term studies
- Great for standard IVF and younger women preserving fertility
❌ Cons:
- Does not offer PRP or rejuvenation therapies
- Less personalized experience
- Limited innovation for women with low ovarian reserve
Compared to RFC: NYU is strong for standard, research-driven care. RFC leads in innovation for women over 40, especially those wanting less invasive options.
3. Weill Cornell Medicine Center for Reproductive Medicine
Affiliation: Cornell University
Focus: Complex cases, research-based fertility care
✅ Pros:
- Strong academic reputation
- Experienced with high-risk or complex fertility cases
- Integrated access to genetic counseling and maternal-fetal medicine
❌ Cons:
- Can be difficult to get quick appointments
- Less tailored for patients seeking holistic/natural options
Compared to RFC: Cornell is ideal for patients needing high-level diagnostics or multiple specialties. RFC is better for streamlined care and natural protocols.
4. Center for Human Reproduction (CHR)
Location: NYC
Focus: Women over 40, diminished ovarian reserve, PRP (blood-derived only)
✅ Pros:
- Experts in treating women with very low ovarian reserve
- Offers blood-based PRP through clinical trials
- Research-based, with personalized IVF protocols
❌ Cons:
- No adipose PRP
- Clinic experience can feel research-heavy or intense
- Some patients report a more clinical/less warm atmosphere
Compared to RFC: CHR is best for patients in severe fertility decline open to trials. RFC offers both innovation and warmth, especially with adipose PRP and lifestyle integration.
5. CCRM New York (Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine)
Location: Flatiron, NYC
Focus: High-tech IVF, embryo banking, international patients
✅ Pros:
- High success rates with genetically tested embryos
- State-of-the-art lab
- Efficient, streamlined processes
❌ Cons:
- Expensive
- Less emphasis on gentle IVF or fertility rejuvenation
- Less continuity of care across physicians
Compared to RFC: CCRM is best for patients seeking aggressive IVF with high embryo yield. RFC caters to those who want a gentler approach or who are seeking fertility optimization in later reproductive years.
6. Shady Grove Fertility (SGF)
Overview: One of the largest fertility networks in the U.S., with many locations across states and internationally.
✅ Pros:
- Extensive insurance partnerships and financial programs.
- High volume of IVF cycles and advanced lab infrastructure.
- Shared risk/refund programs for IVF and egg donation.
- Large pool of fertility doctors and donor options.
- Strong presence in research and clinical trials
❌ Cons:
- High-volume model may lead to less individualized care.
- Standard IVF protocols may involve higher medication doses.
- Can feel more “corporate” or impersonal to some patients.
- Longer wait times for appointments or certain procedures.
7. Boston IVF (BIVF)
Overview: Leading fertility center with over 30 years of experience and multiple clinics across New England.
✅ Pros:
- Strong academic affiliation with Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel.
- Offers a wide range of fertility services, including egg freezing, IVF, and LGBTQ+ family-building options.
- Research-driven care, including genetic screening and preimplantation testing (PGT).
- Access to clinical trials and donor banks.
❌ Cons:
- Traditional IVF protocols are the norm—less focus on natural IVF.
- May be less flexible for patients seeking alternative or holistic options.
- Patients may report feeling like “a number” in such a large, busy system.
- Costs can be high, and some treatments may not be covered.
8. San Diego Fertility Center (SDFC)
✅ Pros:
- Strong reputation for egg donation and surrogacy (especially for LGBTQ+ and international patients).
- Large and experienced physician team.
- High-tech lab with advanced PGT and embryo freezing.
- Accepts international patients and offers concierge services.
- Frequently ranked among top IVF clinics in Southern California.
❌ Cons:
- Focused on traditional, high-stimulation IVF protocols.
- Can feel corporate or busy, with less doctor face-time.
- Less emphasis on low-intervention or natural IVF approaches.
- Higher price point than some boutique clinics like RFC.
9. Reproductive Partners Medical Group (RPMG)
✅ Pros:
- Academic ties with UCLA and involvement in clinical research.
- Offers PGT, donor egg, surrogacy, and fertility preservation.
- Multiple SoCal locations (e.g., Redondo Beach, Irvine, Beverly Hills).
- Broad insurance acceptance and patient financing options.
- Strong for conventional IVF with evidence-based protocols.
❌ Cons:
- Traditional approach — less emphasis on natural/low-stim protocols.
- PRP and regenerative therapies generally not offered.
- May feel more like a hospital setting than a boutique experience.
- Wait times may be longer for new patients.
10. Columbia University Fertility Center
✅ Pros:
- Academic affiliation ensures access to the latest research, technologies, and clinical trials.
- Full-service fertility care: IVF, egg/sperm/embryo freezing, PGT, donor programs, LGBTQ+ family building, and fertility preservation.
- Highly experienced physician team with sub-specialty certifications.
- Broad insurance participation, especially for NY residents.
- Great option for patients with complex or rare fertility conditions.
- Offers multidisciplinary care and connection to Columbia’s broader medical specialties.
❌ Cons:
- Standard IVF protocols with less emphasis on low-intervention or natural approaches.
- Can feel more institutional or impersonal, due to its hospital-based setting.
- Longer wait times for consultations and treatments.
- Typically higher cost than boutique practices if uninsured.
- Regenerative options like PRP, stem cells, or IVM IVF are not routinely available.
11. CNY Fertility Center
✅ Pros:
- Extremely low-cost IVF compared to most U.S. clinics
- Offers financing options and works with third-party funding
- Provides PRP ovarian rejuvenation and acupuncture add-ons
- Large volume clinic with extensive social media community
- Accepts a wide range of patients, including complex and older cases
❌ Cons:
- High patient volume means less individualized attention
- Long wait times for appointments, cycles, and communication
- Patients often report difficulty reaching providers or staff
- Travel required for many patients due to few urban locations
- Success rates not clearly published by age bracket
12. Northwell Health Fertility / Northwell Health System
✅ Pros:
- Full-service fertility center with access to hospital-based care
- Strong insurance coverage, including major NY providers and employer plans
- Access to egg freezing, IVF, ICSI, PGT, fertility preservation, donor sperm/egg programs
- Part of a large academic system—convenient if integrated with other health needs
- Multiple locations and access to fertility surgery and diagnostics
❌ Cons:
- Typically uses high-dose IVF protocols; not focused on natural or minimal stimulation
- Less individualized care; patients often see different providers throughout treatment
- Limited or no regenerative therapies (e.g., PRP, stem cells, ozone)
- Longer wait times for consults, monitoring, and embryo transfers
- More institutional experience—less flexibility or personalization
13. Long Island IVF
✅ Pros:
- Longstanding reputation with over 30 years of experience
- Full-service fertility care (IVF, IUI, egg freezing, donor egg/sperm)
- Accepts most major insurance plans
- Multiple locations across Long Island
- Access to fertility preservation, LGBTQ+ family building, and reproductive surgery
- Academic affiliation with Stony Brook Medicine
❌ Cons:
- Primarily uses conventional IVF protocols (less focus on natural or mini-IVF)
- Limited availability of regenerative therapies like PRP or ozone
- Patients may rotate between providers; less continuity
- Wait times can be longer due to clinic size and volume
- Less individualized than boutique models
14. Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey (RMA NJ)
✅ Pros:
- Large, well-established clinic with extensive IVF cycle volume
- Access to advanced reproductive technologies (e.g., conventional IVF, ICSI, PGT, donor programs)
- Broad insurance acceptance and financing options
- Strong clinical research and access to numerous clinical trials
- Multiple convenient locations in New Jersey and New York
❌ Cons:
- Less personalized care due to large patient volume
- Potentially longer wait times
- More conventional IVF-focused, with less emphasis on natural or regenerative therapies
- Higher costs depending on insurance coverage and services used
⭐ Rejuvenating Fertility Center (RFC)
Locations: NYC, Westchester, Brooklyn, Long Island, Connecticut
Focus: Mild IVF, Natural IVF, PRP & Adipose PRP, holistic care, women over 40
✅ Pros:
- First U.S. clinic to offer Adipose PRP ovarian rejuvenation
- Focus on women over 40, older women, and those with diminished ovarian reserve
- Specializes in natural and minimal stimulation IVF
- Focus on older women and diminished ovarian reserve
- Offers ozone sauna, acupuncture, and integrative medicine
- No wait times, boutique-style care, and same doctor throughout
- Transparent pricing
- No waiting period for most treatments.
- Has a location in the Bahamas where it offers Stem Cell Ovarian Rejuvenation
- Named as Best Fertility Clinic for Women Over 40
- Over 80% of RFC patients are over 40
- Top ranking for women over 40
❌ Cons:
- Smaller team and fewer locations than hospital-affiliated centers
- Not ideal if you prefer aggressive, high-dose stimulation IVF
- May not be covered by all major insurance plans.
✨ Final Thoughts
If you’re over 40, have low AMH, or prefer a more holistic fertility journey, Rejuvenating Fertility Center (RFC) offers a rare combination of medical innovation and personalized care. While larger clinics excel in conventional protocols, RFC is ahead of the curve with treatments like Adipose PRP, natural IVF, and mini IVF.
To follow us on instagram, please visit:
https://www.instagram.com/rejuvenatingfertilitycenter?igsh=aWQ4bm5zOW5wOHRw&utm_source=qr